Beethoven was a loner.
Reports are his hair was often dirty. He’d wear a long top coat, pencils in the pockets, and pace the streets, muttering under his likely foul, acidic breath. His personality was neither warm nor appealing. To use contemporary vernacular, he was not well liked. Had there been a club, he would not have been invited.
Upstairs, where it all happened, he’d pore over his scores, for hours on end. The man was a driven perfectionist; his original manuscripts show so many scribbled erasures so as to have damaged the paper upon which his markings were made.
The totality of his compositions, while many, were not what one would call evidence of a prolific; rather, they were each in their own way masterpieces. They were masterpieces because, whether Beethoven himself realized it or not, he was changing the sound of music for ages to come.
And, in fact, there is hardly a civilized person who cannot place the 9 Beethoven symphonies among the pearls of creative treasure for all of history.
Bach preceded Beethoven, by a stretch.
His output was enormous.
Each Sunday, there was a new Chorale for the church. Bach wrote 600 of these. And, within the mainstream of cultured society, although they are among the most beautiful of musical creations he isn’t even known for them; most cite his volumes of two and three part inventions for keyboard instruments, his partitas, his chaconnes, his toccattas and fugues.
Two singular composers, both creative geniuses.
Is one of higher value than the other?
In matters of taste, two constituencies may form. Under Beethoven, those who prefer to be moved by chordal harmonies and driving rhythm; under Bach, those affected by the intricate complexity of voicing and counterpoint.
But, each contributed not by the collected volume of individual works, but by sheer artistic impact. Regardless the quantity, the power of their affect lay in the quality.
Let’s not ask of our artists that they fulfill our time based expectations. Let us cast aside judgment against the frequency of their contributions. Art needs neither justification, nor critique upon its merit. The next masterpiece may already be in progress. All we have to do is wait, and prepare our hearts.
.
.
.
© 10/18/18 Ruth Ann Scanzillo. Thank you for respecting original material.
littlebarefeetblog.com
It would have been such an amazing time to be alive! ❤️
LikeLiked by 1 person
Today “More geese that swans there be, More fool than wise.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLike
Read this again today. Actually, Bach did not have much of a historical impact until Mendelssohn rediscovered him in the 19th century. Up until that point, his music had been considered old fashioned and somewhat academic. His sons achieved much greater fame in their lifetimes than J.S. ever dreamed of. And while today he is considered one of the immortals and, at the very least, the consummate contrapuntalist, his music did not have an impact on the course of music in the same way that Beethoven’s music did. Music was never the same after Beethoven.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This fits my gut reaction; naturally, there are always gaps in my historical accuracy, and I end up editing repeatedly after the fact. Spent entirely too much time privately speculating about who was sleeping with whom during Cutler Silliman’s history lectures. Sigh. What a waste. That’s what virginity does to the mind. “A mind is a terrible thing to waste [on virginity]”. More sigh.
LikeLike