All posts by ruth ann scanzillo

Unknown's avatar

About ruth ann scanzillo

Professional 'cellist/pianist, private Suzuki string instructor; ....former public school music teacher/childrens' drama coach; .... [ serious ] avocational writer.........background in graphic design/illustration.....influences: Lance Morrow; Garrison Keillor; Peggy Noonan; Erma Bombeck; James Kavanaugh; Billy Collins; Leonard Cohen; and, Alice Munro. Local eccentric, social loner, overdriven imaginator, speculator, and wisening woman. Thank you for reading. And, thank you, WordPress, for the whole thing.

BODY PARTS.

[ formerly titled “Stinkbug.” ]

You tear out

the muscle cells of her heart;

she carries them home,

so like mussel shells,

in the palms of her hands

.

You wrench apart

desperately clasped arms

and nail them to your crucifying cross

kneeling beneath

her feet

you cast lots on the discarded fabric

of her hope

as she hangs

crooked bent and breaking

.

The demented

would marry her at once

mocking every deathbed sacrament

while Bohemians

who leave the upper crust

in dust

all turn their chins

away from ebbing breath.

.

Hot urine

comforting her lurching thighs

the bedsheets swaddle them

in wracking dreams

.

You, just and

just again beyond her reach

One stinkbug

on its back

and soil sustaining worms await

Her finally succumbing sleep.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Copyright 3/6/25 Ruth Ann Scanzillo littlebarefeetblog.com All rights solely those of the author, whose name appears above this line. Thank you for being honest.

The Fixative.

It came in cans.

To any “artist” of the 1970’s who didn’t paint or silkscreen, fixative was an essential tool in every materials kit.

Sprayed across the surface of any graphite, charcoal, Conte crayon, or pastel drawing what otherwise smudged easily at the slightest touch would be rendered impervious.

I can’t recall what toxic cocktail was required to formulate the product – probably a solvent, some silicone and, of course, a drying agent; but, once the potent smell dissipated, each finished piece was sure to be protected from all invaders, both foreign and domestic, and into perpetuity.

Yes. The smell.

During that era, there were plenty of aromatic fumes. Mineral spirits, the chief deterrent to painting for me, was nauseating and, used to clean both paint and silkscreen ink, produced headaches and diarrhea. Permanent markers would be found decades later to cause kidney and liver diseases. Spray paint was probably a neurotoxin. And, the list went on. In order to make something beautiful, artists had to descend into the pit of outgassing poison.

Enter the digital age. Now, the only real known contaminant is blue light, emanating from the screens of any number of painter products. Even the coloration was now ensconced inside the ever increasing sophistication of the all-in-one printer.

But, back in the day, any work of art not incorporating actual paint was produced by hand using concrete, earthen substances and preserved by a single, aerosolized, rattling can of fixative.

I’d made my share of what were called “finished” drawings. Most of these took hours to complete, under the watchful tutelage of college level instructors. Give me a nude human in the middle of the room, and I could stay focused, first for seconds, then minutes, and finally however long it took ’til completion. I was a twenty-something – virginal, naiive, impressionable, and gullible – but, I had no known emotional problems. My ability to concentrate on completing works of art was just driven by what anyone might call selective, heightened desire.

Enter obsessive-compulsion. That would appear, a decade later, after the Swine flu vaccine and its subsequent panel of allergic reactions.

Dad had expressed symptoms of OCD. But, we’d hardly given them a serious nod; his need to check the door lock five or six times, well, that was just Dad, being quirky. Repeated visits to the bathroom mirror to feel and examine his nostrils; again, probably boredom on that one day off from cutting hair at the shop.

I wouldn’t know that OCD could sort of smolder in the first decades, provoked only by stressors. I couldn’t know that life itself would intensify these, in spades.

But, my first serious relationship break up would set a spotlight on obsession like something out of a horror movie. Could I stop circling his block in my car, accelerating faster each revolution, vitals escalating? Pre-ceding email and text, how many letters would I draft and copy and stamp and send? And, well before answering machines, how many times would his phone ring before he’d yank it from the wall?

OCD invades every aspect of interpersonal exchange. Every business arrangement. All social plans. It lies in wait, to sabotage anything worth sustaining.

Lately, instead of ruminating over the more typical repetitious thoughts, I’d been taken to dwelling on the syndrome itself. What caused obsessive compulsion? Were there catalysts? If so, how to intercept them? Perhaps, if confronted, there could be some welcome neutralization?

I’d read a paper, awhile back, and written about it. There were brain chemical deficits, but whence had they arisen? Rather than replace what was missing, why not get at the root cause?

My primary symptom, of recent date, had been fixation. Something, or someone, would captivate my imagination. Accompanied by mild euphoria, I found joy in riding this. But now, as the much older woman, I could recognize that the object of my fixation was neither responsible either for my actions as motivated OR for defining them; in short, the object, including any desirable traits my mind had assigned, was actually secondary. It was the fixation, itself, which both fueled my energy, drove my behavior, and provided the sought after experience. I had become slave to the fixative.

The conventional kind still comes in a can. For sale at any craft store, their supply can be updated anytime.

Fine art restorers likely have a product which unfixes the surfaces of ancient finds. For something that will liberate me, and release whatever is worthy deeply embedded beneath, I’m still waiting.

Here’s hoping it smells like candy.

.

.

.

.

Copyright 12/7/24 Ruth Ann Scanzillo. No copying, in part or whole or by translation, permitted without written release by the author, whose name appears above this line. Thank you for writing your own story, instead.

TAKE THE GUN.

Every year, at this season, so many of us enjoy “The Sound of Music”.

We marvel at the love story between Baron Von Trapp and Maria, his employed governess to the children. We also recognize the historical significance of a true tale, set during Hitler’s rise to power, of life saving escape.

But, at recent airing, having tuned in late to witness only the close of the final act I was struck by what just might be the single most powerful gesture in the entire account, and that by the true hero of the story.

Successfully absconded from the clutches of military police intent upon their capture, the Von Trapp family finds a hiding place in the graveyard of a nearby monastery. Huddling behind a monument, they hold their breath as, flashlights finally turning, the police head away from their lair. Then, Baron Von Trapp deftly motions for Maria and the children to run toward their awaiting car, leaving only two – himself, and Rolph, eldest daughter Leisel’s former flame turned Hitler’s army.

Rolph stands, alone, gun drawn. Stepping out of the shadows, Von Trapp faces him.

How many an American Western had set this scene: two men, facing off, both armed. But, in this instance, Von Trapp appears defenseless, staring into the eyes of he who holds the only loaded weapon.

With absolute, self possessed courage, Von Trapp speaks. His tone is quiet, but firm. Eyes fixed on his assailant, he begins to step toward him. Slowly, in approach, he continues to speak words of persuasive power and reason. Within seconds, the two men are inches apart.

What happens next is the stuff of legend.

Baron Von Trapp reaches for the gun and, clasping it, releases the weapon from Rolph’s grasp.

How he manages to do so is the point.

Throughout life, each of us reaches moments of psychic confrontation. Whether we both acknowledge and seize upon them determines, in many ways, our destiny. Threat is palpable, but other manifestations of force are more subtle, like subjugation, subversion, or suppression. Becoming aware that the gun is aimed at us is step number one.

The next move is critical. Do we name the daemon*, and look it squarely in the eye, or scuttle off in some form of obedient submission? What convinces us to allow our spirit to be diminished by any other, and to what purpose?

Von Trapp used reason to bend the warped mind of Rolph, even as he got closer to that which could annihilate him.

If we are to save the music, protect all love stories, and survive that which encroaches on our right to freedom, we need to nourish our power to disarm.

We must take the gun.

.

.

* “Love And Will” – Rollo May.

Copyright 12/17/24. Ruth Ann Scanzillo. No copying, in part or whole or by translation, without sharing the source. Thank you.